Subscribe
, , , ,

Review of the iPhone 4

MRPMWoodman
Follow Me
MRPMWoodman
Company Director/CEO at Depressed Media Ltd
Paul (Poison Fish) Manjyu Woodman
MRPMWoodman
Follow Me
Latest posts by MRPMWoodman (see all)
81 / 100
Powered by Rank Math SEO
SEO Score

Review of the iPhone 4

Different ColorsThe iPhone 4 was initially available in Black. A White variant was released later on April 28, 2011, for both GSM and CDMA models.Year Date AnnouncedJune 7, 2010Date When You Could BuyJune 24, 2010 (initial release in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Japan for the GSM model in Black).Brief Introduction (150 words)The iPhone 4, unveiled by Apple in 2010, marked a revolutionary leap in smartphone design and functionality, redefining the mobile industry with its sleek glass-and-steel construction and groundbreaking Retina display. Announced on June 7 and available from June 24, this device introduced features like FaceTime video calling, a high-resolution 5MP camera with HD video, and multitasking via iOS 4. Powered by the Apple A4 chip, it offered improved performance over predecessors, appealing to consumers seeking premium build and ecosystem integration. Despite early controversies like antenna issues, it sold millions rapidly, solidifying Apple’s dominance. Assembled in China by manufacturers like Foxconn, the iPhone 4 emphasized durability with chemically strengthened glass, though it lacked modern amenities like water resistance. Its legacy endures as a design icon, influencing subsequent models while highlighting Apple’s focus on innovation and user experience in a competitive market.Country of OriginUnited States (designed by Apple in California, assembled in China)Name of ManufacturerApple Inc.Web Linkhttps://www.apple.comCharger Type30-pin dock connector with USB chargerHow Long to Charge the BatteryApproximately 2-3 hours for a full charge from 0% to 100% using the included 5W USB power adapter, depending on usage and conditions (based on historical user reports and testing, as official specs did not specify exact times).Display (200+ words)The iPhone 4’s display was a game-changer, featuring a 3.5-inch LED-backlit IPS TFT LCD with a 960×640 resolution at 326 pixels per inch (ppi), dubbed the “Retina display” by Apple because it exceeded the human eye’s ability to distinguish individual pixels at typical viewing distances. This marked a significant upgrade from the iPhone 3GS’s 480×320 screen, offering four times the pixel density for sharper text, images, and videos. The 800:1 contrast ratio and 500 cd/m² maximum brightness ensured vivid colors and excellent visibility indoors, though outdoor performance in direct sunlight was adequate but not exceptional compared to later AMOLED panels. The fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating on both front and back glass reduced smudges, enhancing usability during touch interactions. Multi-touch support allowed precise gestures, and the IPS technology provided wide viewing angles up to 178 degrees without color shifting.In practical use, the display excelled in media consumption; watching 720p videos felt immersive, and reading e-books or browsing web pages was crisp and strain-free. However, its 3:2 aspect ratio limited widescreen content, often resulting in letterboxing. Compared to contemporaries like the Samsung Galaxy S’s Super AMOLED, the iPhone 4’s screen was brighter and more color-accurate for photo editing, but lacked the infinite blacks of OLED. Durability was bolstered by chemically strengthened aluminosilicate glass, 20 times stiffer than plastic, resisting scratches better than previous models. Drawbacks included no auto-brightness adjustment based on content, and the glossy finish could reflect glare in bright environments. Overall, the Retina display set a new standard, influencing future smartphones and earning praise for its clarity, though by 2025 standards, it feels small and dated against larger, higher-refresh-rate screens on modern devices like the iPhone 16.Processor (200+ words)At the heart of the iPhone 4 was Apple’s custom A4 system-on-chip (SoC), a 1 GHz single-core 32-bit ARM Cortex-A8 processor underclocked to 800 MHz for efficiency, paired with a PowerVR SGX535 GPU. This marked Apple’s first in-house designed chip, manufactured by Samsung on a 45nm process, integrating CPU, GPU, and memory controller for optimized performance. With 512 MB of LPDDR DRAM—double that of the iPhone 3GS—it enabled smoother multitasking introduced in iOS 4, allowing apps to run in the background without excessive battery drain. The A4’s architecture focused on power efficiency, delivering up to 40% better performance in CPU-intensive tasks like app launching and web rendering compared to predecessors.Benchmark-wise, it scored around 400 in Geekbench single-core tests, modest by today’s standards but revolutionary in 2010, outperforming rivals like the Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 in the HTC Desire. The GPU handled 3D graphics capably, supporting games like Infinity Blade with fluid frame rates, though it lacked the multi-core prowess of later chips. Heat management was excellent, with minimal throttling during extended use, thanks to the compact design. However, limitations emerged in demanding scenarios; video editing or heavy browsing could cause occasional stutters, and the single-core setup struggled with modern apps post-iOS 7. Compared to the Samsung Galaxy S’s Hummingbird chip, the A4 offered better integration with iOS, resulting in snappier UI responses. Sustainability aspects included lower power consumption, extending battery life, but the chip’s obsolescence by 2014 halted further optimizations. In retrospect, the A4 pioneered Apple’s silicon dominance, paving the way for advanced AI and graphics in subsequent models, though its age renders the iPhone 4 unsuitable for 2025’s software demands.Performance (200+ words)The iPhone 4 delivered impressive performance for its era, leveraging the A4 chip and 512 MB RAM to handle iOS 4’s new multitasking features seamlessly. Apps launched quickly—Safari pages loaded in under 2 seconds on Wi-Fi—and switching between them felt fluid, a vast improvement over the iPhone 3GS’s single-tasking limitations. Gaming performance was solid; titles like Angry Birds ran at consistent 30fps, and the integrated gyroscope enhanced motion controls for immersive experiences like racing games. Synthetic benchmarks placed it ahead of contemporaries, with SunSpider JavaScript tests completing in about 3,500ms, faster than the Nokia N8’s Symbian setup.In daily use, the device excelled at productivity tasks: email, calendar syncing, and note-taking were lag-free, supported by the responsive touchscreen. However, under heavy load—like running multiple apps or HD video recording—minor slowdowns occurred due to the single-core processor. Battery efficiency helped sustain performance; it avoided aggressive throttling, unlike some Android rivals that overheated. Compared to the Samsung Galaxy S, the iPhone 4 offered more consistent frame rates in graphics-heavy apps, thanks to optimized iOS integration. Drawbacks included limited RAM for modern standards, causing app reloads in iOS 7, and no support for advanced features like Siri. By 2025, performance feels archaic; simple tasks work, but web browsing modern sites is sluggish, and it can’t run current apps. Historically, it set benchmarks for reliability, with low crash rates and smooth animations, influencing smartphone expectations. Overall, the iPhone 4’s performance balanced power and efficiency, making it a benchmark device in 2010, though time has diminished its capabilities against multi-core behemoths like the A18 in newer iPhones.Camera System (200+ words)The iPhone 4’s camera system was a highlight, featuring a 5-megapixel rear sensor with back-side illumination for better low-light performance, capturing photos at 2592×1936 resolution. It included a 5x digital zoom, autofocus, and an LED flash, plus geotagging for location data. Video recording reached 720p HD at 30fps, a first for iPhones, with tap-to-focus for sharp results. The front-facing 0.3MP VGA camera enabled FaceTime video calls at 480p, revolutionizing personal communication. Image quality was superior to the 3GS; colors were natural, detail sharp in daylight, and noise reduced in dim conditions thanks to 1.75μm pixel size and a 4-element lens.In use, the camera app was intuitive, with quick shutter speeds under 1 second, ideal for spontaneous shots. Editing tools in iOS allowed basic adjustments, and integration with iPhoto enhanced workflow. Compared to rivals like the Nokia N8’s 12MP Carl Zeiss lens, the iPhone 4 prioritized simplicity over megapixels, delivering reliable results for social sharing. Low-light shots suffered from grain, and no optical zoom limited versatility. The front camera, while innovative, was low-res for selfies by today’s standards. Sustainability notes: the system used less power than bulkier DSLRs, promoting mobile photography. By 2025, it pales against 108MP sensors, but historically, it democratized HD video, influencing content creation. Additional features like HDR (added in iOS 4.1) improved dynamic range. Overall, the camera balanced quality and ease, earning acclaim for everyday use, though lacking advanced modes like panorama, it set the stage for Apple’s photography dominance.Battery (200+ words)The iPhone 4 housed a 3.7V, 5.3Wh (1,420 mAh) non-removable lithium-ion battery, offering up to 7 hours of 3G talk time, 14 hours on 2G, 10 hours of video playback, 40 hours of audio, and 300 hours standby. This was a 16% capacity increase over the 3GS, enabled by the slimmer design and efficient A4 chip, allowing all-day usage for moderate tasks like calls, browsing, and light gaming. Real-world tests showed it lasting 5-6 hours of screen-on time, impressive for 2010, with background apps minimally impacting drain thanks to iOS optimizations.Factors like screen brightness and connectivity affected longevity; Wi-Fi use extended life versus 3G. Compared to the HTC EVO 4G’s 1,500 mAh battery, the iPhone 4 was more efficient, avoiding rapid depletion during video calls. Drawbacks included no user-replaceable design, requiring service for degradation, and heavier use (e.g., GPS navigation) halved runtime. By iOS 7, efficiency waned due to unsupported features. Sustainability: The battery’s longevity reduced e-waste, but lithium mining raised environmental concerns. In 2025, aged units hold 70-80% capacity, necessitating frequent charging. Historically, it set standards for balanced power management, influencing eco-friendly designs. Additional tips: Low-power mode (post-iOS) wasn’t available, but disabling Bluetooth helped. Overall, the battery provided reliable endurance, outperforming many Android peers in mixed use, though modern expectations for 5,000+ mAh cells highlight its limitations. It empowered untethered lifestyles, a key selling point.Charging (200+ words)Charging the iPhone 4 relied on a 30-pin dock connector paired with a 5W USB power adapter, taking about 2-3 hours for a full charge from empty, with 80% reached in 1.5 hours. This wired-only system connected to computers or wall outlets via USB 2.0, syncing data simultaneously. No wireless charging existed, reflecting 2010 tech, but the proprietary port ensured stable, fast transfers. Efficiency was solid; the A4 chip’s low power draw minimized heat, and iOS managed background charging intelligently.Compared to micro-USB on Android devices like the Samsung Galaxy S, Apple’s connector was more durable but less universal, often requiring adapters. Drawbacks: No fast-charging tech meant longer waits than modern 20W systems, and cable wear was common. Sustainability: Reusable chargers reduced waste, but proprietary design led to e-waste from incompatible accessories. In ecosystem terms, it integrated with iTunes for seamless backups during charge. By 2025, finding original chargers is challenging, with third-party options risking safety. Historical context: It pioneered efficient power delivery, influencing USB-C transitions. Additional features: Overcharge protection prevented damage, and status indicators showed progress. Overall, charging was straightforward and reliable, suiting daily needs without frills, though slow by current standards. It emphasized Apple’s control over hardware, ensuring consistency but limiting flexibility. Users praised its simplicity, but critics noted the lack of universality, a pain point resolved in later models.Connectivity (200+ words)Connectivity on the iPhone 4 included Wi-Fi 802.11b/g/n (2.4GHz only), Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR, and cellular options: quad-band GSM/EDGE and UMTS/HSDPA/HSUPA for GSM models, or dual-band CDMA/EV-DO for Verizon variants. It supported speeds up to 7.2 Mbps download, adequate for 2010 web browsing and app downloads. Dual microphones enabled noise cancellation for clearer calls, and the stainless steel frame served as antennas, though this caused “death grip” signal issues. GPS with A-GPS, digital compass, and proximity sensor enhanced navigation.In practice, Wi-Fi was stable for streaming, and Bluetooth paired easily with headsets, but lacked file transfer to non-Apple devices. Compared to the Nokia N8’s FM radio and HDMI, the iPhone 4 focused on core wireless essentials. Drawbacks: No NFC or 4G LTE, limiting future-proofing, and antenna problems required bumpers. Sustainability: Efficient radios conserved energy, reducing carbon footprint. By 2025, 3G networks’ shutdown renders it obsolete for cellular use in many regions. Ecosystem integration: Seamless with AirPlay for media sharing. Additional: Geotagging tied location to photos. Overall, connectivity was innovative, introducing reliable video calls via FaceTime over Wi-Fi, but vulnerabilities like signal attenuation marred experiences. It set precedents for integrated antennas, influencing designs, though modern 5G and Wi-Fi 6 highlight its age. Users valued call quality, but global variants complicated roaming.Operating System (200+ words)The iPhone 4 launched with iOS 4.0 (GSM) or iOS 4.2.10 (CDMA), introducing multitasking, app folders, and iBooks. It supported up to iOS 7.1.2, adding features like Game Center, HDR photography, and iCloud basics. The Unix-based OS emphasized security with sandboxing and encrypted data, delivering a fluid interface via gesture controls. Updates were over-the-air from iOS 5, easing maintenance.Performance on iOS 4 was snappy, with animations at 60fps, but iOS 7’s redesign caused lags due to hardware limits. Compared to Android 2.2 on the Galaxy S, iOS offered better app optimization and fewer crashes. Drawbacks: No widgets or customizable home screens initially, and Siri was absent. Sustainability: Long support (until 2014) extended device life, reducing waste. In ecosystem, it synced with iTunes for media management. By 2025, unsupported status means no security patches, posing risks. Additional: Voice control predated Siri. Overall, iOS transformed the iPhone 4 into a versatile pocket computer, with intuitive navigation and vast App Store. It pioneered modern mobile OS paradigms, like notifications, influencing competitors. Users lauded its simplicity, but critics noted closed nature limiting tweaks. Historically, it balanced innovation and stability, setting Apple’s software legacy.Build (200+ words)The iPhone 4’s build featured chemically strengthened aluminosilicate glass panels sandwiching a stainless steel frame, measuring 115.2mm x 58.6mm x 9.3mm and weighing 137g—24% thinner than the 3GS. This “sandwich” design enhanced rigidity, with glass 30 times harder than plastic, resisting bends and drops from waist height. The frame doubled as antennas, a clever integration, but prone to signal interference.Quality felt premium; buttons were tactile, and assembly precise, with no creaks. Compared to plastic-bodied rivals like the HTC Desire, it exuded luxury. Drawbacks: Glass shattered easily on impacts, and white models yellowed over time. Sustainability: Recyclable materials, but repairs were costly due to glued components. In 2025, surviving units show wear like scratched frames. Additional: IP rating absent, but dust-resistant seals. Overall, the build redefined durability and aesthetics, influencing slab designs. It balanced form and function, earning design awards, though fragility led to cases. Historically, it shifted from curved to flat edges, a trend revived in iPhone 12.Design (200+ words)Design-wise, the iPhone 4 adopted flattened surfaces and squared edges, departing from the 3GS’s curves for a modern, industrial look. The exposed stainless steel band added sophistication, with volume buttons, mute switch, and SIM tray integrated seamlessly. At 9.3mm thin, it felt compact and pocketable, with balanced weight distribution for one-handed use.Aesthetics were iconic; the Retina display dominated the front, minimizing bezels. Compared to the bulbous Galaxy S, it appeared elegant. Drawbacks: Sharp edges dug into hands during long calls, and antenna bands caused grip issues. Sustainability: Minimalist design promoted longevity. In 2025, it evokes nostalgia as a collectible. Additional: Color options limited to black/white. Overall, the design was transformative, blending art and engineering, setting smartphone trends. It prioritized user interaction, with intuitive placement, though practicality suffered. Historically, it won praise for innovation, solidifying Apple’s style.Additional Features (200+ words)Beyond basics, the iPhone 4 included a 3-axis gyroscope for precise motion detection, enhancing AR games and navigation. FaceTime revolutionized video calls over Wi-Fi, integrating with contacts. Sensors like accelerometer, proximity, and ambient light automated screen behavior. Game Center fostered social gaming, and iMovie app enabled on-device video editing.Compared to Android’s fragmentation, these were polished. Drawbacks: No FM radio or expandable storage. Sustainability: Features encouraged digital over physical media. In 2025, many are deprecated. Additional: Digital compass aided maps. Overall, they enriched experiences, making the device versatile. Historically, they pioneered mobile social features.Software (200+ words)Software on the iPhone 4 evolved from iOS 4’s multitasking to iOS 7’s flat design, with App Store access to over 500,000 apps by 2011. Security included passcodes and remote wipe. Customizations were limited, focusing on stability.Compared to Symbian, it was user-friendly. Drawbacks: No Adobe Flash support. Sustainability: Updates prolonged usability. In 2025, it’s insecure. Additional: Spotlight search. Overall, software defined its longevity, emphasizing ecosystem lock-in.Ecosystem (200+ words)The iPhone 4 integrated into Apple’s ecosystem, syncing with iTunes, iCloud, and devices like iPad for continuity. FaceTime connected across platforms, and App Store exclusivity drove revenue.Compared to Android’s openness, it was seamless. Drawbacks: Walled garden limited interoperability. Sustainability: Reduced need for multiple devices. In 2025, it pairs with legacy Macs. Additional: iBooks ecosystem. Overall, it strengthened Apple’s dominance, fostering loyalty.Sustainability (200+ words)Sustainability for the iPhone 4 involved recyclable aluminum and glass, with lead-free displays. Apple’s trade-in programs encouraged recycling, and efficient hardware minimized energy use. However, non-replaceable battery and glued assembly hindered repairs, increasing e-waste.Compared to modular phones, it scored lower. By 2025, many are landfilled. Additional: Packaging was minimal. Overall, it advanced eco-design but fell short in repairability, prompting modern improvements.How Many Produced So FarApple does not disclose exact production figures, but sales estimates indicate over 60 million iPhone 4 units were sold worldwide by the end of its lifecycle, with 1.7 million in the first three days and 3 million in the first month.
 
List 5 Pros
  1. Iconic Retina display for sharp visuals.
  2. Premium glass-and-steel build quality.
  3. Innovative FaceTime video calling.
  4. Efficient multitasking with iOS 4.
  5. Excellent camera for its time.
List 5 Cons
  1. Antenna reception issues (“death grip”).
  2. No water resistance.
  3. Limited RAM causing app reloads in later iOS.
  4. Proprietary 30-pin charger.
  5. No expandable storage.
List 5 Best Features
  1. Retina display with 326 ppi.
  2. FaceTime front camera integration.
  3. Gyroscope for enhanced gaming.
  4. HD video recording at 720p.
  5. Noise-cancelling dual microphones.
List 5 Negative Features
  1. Fragile glass prone to shattering.
  2. Signal loss from hand placement.
  3. Slow charging speeds.
  4. Lack of Flash support in browser.
  5. Obsolete by modern connectivity standards.
How Far Under Water It Can Go and For How LongThe iPhone 4 has no official water resistance rating (IP rating) and is not waterproof. It can potentially survive brief accidental splashes but submerging it even shallowly (e.g., 0 meters for any duration) risks permanent damage from water ingress.
 
List Five Similar Phones
  1. Samsung Galaxy S
  2. HTC Droid Incredible
  3. HTC EVO 4G
  4. Google Nexus One
  5. Nokia N8
Date Software Stopped Getting UpdatesJune 30, 2014 (final update: iOS 7.1.2)Price on Release
  • UK: £499 (16GB unlocked)
  • Europe: €629 (16GB unlocked, e.g., Germany)
  • America: $199 (16GB with contract) / $599 unlocked
  • Japan: ¥57,600 (16GB unlocked, approx. $620)
  • China: CNY 4,999 (16GB, approx. $744)
Price New NowAs of July 10, 2025, the iPhone 4 is discontinued and not officially sold new by Apple. Rare new-in-box units from collectors or third-party sellers fetch premium prices:
  • UK: £200-£300
  • Europe: €250-€350
  • America: $250-$400
  • Japan: ¥30,000-¥50,000 (approx. $200-$330)
  • China: CNY 1,500-2,500 (approx. $200-$350)
Highest Price Used
  • UK: £150 (collectible condition)
  • Europe: €180
  • America: $200
  • Japan: ¥25,000 (approx. $165)
  • China: CNY 1,200 (approx. $165)
Lowest Price Used
  • UK: £20 (working but worn)
  • Europe: €25
  • America: $30
  • Japan: ¥3,000 (approx. $20)
  • China: CNY 150 (approx. $20)
15 Reviews with Japanese NamesPositive:
  1. Hiroshi Tanaka: “The Retina display is breathtaking! Changed how I view photos forever.”
  2. Aiko Suzuki: “Love the design—feels like a premium device in hand. FaceTime is magical for family calls.”
  3. Kenji Yamamoto: “Battery lasts all day, and the camera captures great memories. Best phone of its time!”
  4. Yumi Nakamura: “Smooth performance even after years. Apple’s quality shines through.”
  5. Taro Sato: “Innovative features like multitasking made it a game-changer. Still nostalgic!”
Neutral:
  1. Miko Kobayashi: “Decent camera for basics, but low-light shots are average. Solid build though.”
  2. Jiro Ikeda: “Performance is okay for light use, but struggles with newer apps now.”
  3. Sanae Fujita: “Design is classic, yet fragile. Good for calls, not much else in 2025.”
  4. Daichi Hayashi: “Battery is fine for a day, charging takes time. Neutral on overall value.”
  5. Rina Mori: “Connectivity works, but no 4G. It’s a relic with some charm.”
Negative:
  1. Akira Watanabe: “Antenna issues ruin calls—signal drops constantly. Frustrating!”
  2. Haruka Kato: “Glass breaks easily, and repairs are expensive. Not durable.”
  3. Shinji Ono: “Outdated software, can’t run modern apps. Feels obsolete.”
  4. Natsuki Takahashi: “No water resistance—ruined mine in rain. Poor design choice.”
  5. Kaito Shimizu: “Slow charging and limited storage. Regret buying back then.”
Conclusion (2000 words)The iPhone 4, released in 2010, stands as a pivotal chapter in the annals of technology, a device that not only redefined smartphones but also reshaped consumer expectations, cultural norms, and the competitive landscape of the mobile industry. Announced by Steve Jobs at the Worldwide Developers Conference on June 7, 2010, and hitting shelves on June 24, it arrived amid immense hype, following the success of its predecessors. With its sleek glass-and-steel design, groundbreaking Retina display, and innovative features like FaceTime, the iPhone 4 wasn’t just a phone; it was a statement of Apple’s vision for the future—a seamless blend of hardware and software that prioritized user experience over raw specifications. Yet, as we reflect in 2025, fifteen years later, its legacy is a complex tapestry of triumphs, controversies, and inevitable obsolescence, offering lessons on innovation, sustainability, and the relentless march of progress.At its core, the iPhone 4’s design was revolutionary. Departing from the plastic curves of the iPhone 3GS, Apple opted for a flattened, industrial aesthetic with chemically strengthened glass panels encasing a stainless steel frame. This “sandwich” construction not only made it 24% thinner at 9.3mm but also imbued it with a premium feel that felt substantial yet elegant in the hand. The exposed steel band, doubling as antennas, was a bold engineering choice, symbolizing Apple’s willingness to integrate form and function. Colors were limited—black at launch, white following in 2011—but this simplicity underscored its minimalist ethos. Critics and users alike praised this design for its durability; the glass was touted as 30 times harder than plastic, resisting everyday scratches. However, this came with trade-offs: the glass was prone to shattering on drops, leading to a booming market for protective cases. The “death grip” antenna issue, where holding the phone a certain way attenuated signal, became a notorious scandal, prompting Apple to offer free bumpers. Despite this, the design influenced countless successors, from the iPhone 12’s flat edges to broader industry trends toward premium materials. In 2025, holding an iPhone 4 evokes nostalgia; it’s compact compared to today’s phablets, reminding us how far we’ve come from 3.5-inch screens to foldables.The Retina display was arguably the iPhone 4’s crowning achievement, a 3.5-inch IPS LCD with 960×640 resolution at 326 ppi—four times that of previous models. Apple claimed it surpassed the human eye’s resolution at typical distances, and indeed, text appeared laser-printed, images razor-sharp, and videos immersive. This set a new benchmark, forcing competitors like Samsung to accelerate their display tech. Brightness reached 500 nits, with an 800:1 contrast ratio ensuring vibrant colors without oversaturation. Yet, by modern standards, it’s diminutive; 120Hz refresh rates and OLED blacks make it feel dated. Still, for 2010, it democratized high-quality visuals, enhancing everything from e-reading to gaming.Performance, powered by the A4 chip—a 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 underclocked to 800MHz with 512MB RAM—was stellar for its time. iOS 4 introduced multitasking, allowing background apps without killing battery, a feat Android struggled with initially. Benchmarks showed it outperforming rivals like the HTC EVO 4G in app launches and web rendering. Gaming benefited from the PowerVR GPU and gyroscope, enabling precise controls in titles like Real Racing. However, single-core limitations surfaced in later updates; iOS 7 brought lags, marking the device’s twilight. In 2025, it’s a relic—capable of basic calls but unfit for apps like TikTok or AR experiences.The camera system pushed boundaries, with a 5MP rear sensor featuring back-side illumination for low-light prowess and 720p HD video—a first for iPhones. Photos were detailed, colors accurate, and the LED flash useful. The front VGA camera enabled FaceTime, turning video calls into a mainstream feature. Compared to the Nokia N8’s 12MP, it prioritized usability over specs, integrating seamlessly with iOS editing tools. Drawbacks included no optical zoom and grainy low-light shots, but it sparked the smartphone photography boom.Battery life, at 1,420 mAh, offered 7 hours of 3G talk or 10 hours video, efficient thanks to the A4’s 45nm process. Charging via 30-pin took 2-3 hours, simple but slow. No wireless or fast charging reflected the era, but it sufficed for daily use. Connectivity encompassed Wi-Fi n, Bluetooth 2.1, and 3G, with noise-cancelling mics for clear calls. The absence of 4G or NFC was a miss, and 3G shutdowns in 2025 render it cellular-obsolete in many areas.iOS evolved from 4.0’s folders to 7.1.2’s refinements, stopping updates on June 30, 2014. This 4-year support was generous then, but short by today’s 7-year pledges. Software was intuitive, secure, and app-rich, though lacking customization. The ecosystem—syncing with Macs, iPads—fostered loyalty, a strategy that built Apple’s trillion-dollar empire.Sustainability was mixed: recyclable materials and efficient design extended life, but glued components hindered repairs, scoring low on iFixit (2/10). No water resistance meant vulnerability to spills, and lithium batteries degraded over time. Apple’s trade-ins helped, but millions ended in landfills. Production estimates hover at 60 million units sold, a massive footprint.Pros shine: iconic display, premium build, FaceTime, camera, multitasking. Cons: antenna woes, fragility, no resistance, proprietary port, no storage. Best features: Retina, FaceTime, HD video, gyroscope, noise cancellation. Negatives: shatter-prone, signal drops, slow charge, no Flash, outdated connectivity.Similar phones like the Galaxy S offered AMOLED alternatives, highlighting 2010’s diversity.Prices at release varied: $199 subsidized in the US, but unlocked £499 UK, €629 Europe, $599 US, ¥57,600 Japan, CNY4,999 China. Today, new units are vintage—£200+ UK, etc.—used from £20 low to £150 high, reflecting collector appeal.User sentiments, echoed in reviews, range from adoration for design to frustration over flaws. The iPhone 4 sold rapidly despite issues, proving Apple’s marketing might.Ultimately, the iPhone 4 wasn’t perfect, but its innovations—Retina, FaceTime, design—propelled smartphones from tools to essentials. It challenged monopolies, sparked creativity, and set durability standards, even as controversies like antennagate tested resilience. In 2025, amid AI-driven devices, it reminds us of simpler times, when a phone’s magic lay in its elegance. Its legacy? Enduring proof that bold risks yield timeless impact.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Paul (Poison Fish) Manjyu Woodman

Paul (Poison Fish) Manjyu Woodman

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Picture of MRPMWoodman
MRPMWoodman
Paul (Poison Fish) Manjyu Woodman
All Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Latest Article
Sponsor
Sponsor
Discount up to 45% for this road trip this month.
Learn more
Keep Reading

Related Article

Data Entry

21.09.2025 No Comments

About Latest Posts Follow Me MRPMWoodman Company Director/CEO at Depressed Media Ltd Paul (Poison Fish) Manjyu Woodman Follow Me Latest posts by MRPMWoodman (see all) Data Entry – 21.09.2025 Free【世界逆転宣言！Music Video】/ 世界逆転宣言！ Sekai Gyakuten Sengen 2025 – 20.09.2025 Free Images cosplay cosplayer maou-chan maou 2025 – 09.09.2025 48 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score MRPMWoodman Paul (Poison Fish) Manjyu Woodman

Sekai Gyakuten Sengen!

Free【世界逆転宣言！Music Video】/ 世界逆転宣言！ Sekai Gyakuten Sengen 2025

20.09.2025 No Comments

About Latest Posts Follow Me MRPMWoodman Company Director/CEO at Depressed Media Ltd Paul (Poison Fish) Manjyu Woodman Follow Me Latest posts by MRPMWoodman (see all) Data Entry – 21.09.2025 Free【世界逆転宣言！Music Video】/ 世界逆転宣言！ Sekai Gyakuten Sengen 2025 – 20.09.2025 Free Images cosplay cosplayer maou-chan maou 2025 – 09.09.2025 86 / 100 Powered by Rank Math SEO SEO Score Sekai Gyakuten Sengen! Members of Sekai Gyakuten Sengen! and their X accounts: https://youtu.be/f-D3bjSR1JM?si=GW8q6hMTExkr8oIELink to Video Youtube Link Maruse Koharu (丸瀬こはる) Low-tone voice, sound producer, water blue rep, anime fan, #ここちゃ可愛いぴえ. Group Official @sekai_gyakuten For announcements and audition updates. Rai no Sui (雷乃すい) Yellow/orange rep, dynamic performer, featured in live shots and merch events. Fukuda Kana (福田かな) Purple rep, “gang” style, music school grad, captain of #セカセンラーメン部. Narumi Rikka (成宮立夏) Boyish rock idol, Fukui native, part of #酒クズぴえん部. Midorigawa Fuyuki (緑川冬葵) Green rep, active in event photos and lives. Sekai Gyakuten Sengen!  (世界逆転宣言！ literally “World Reversal Declaration!”) is a high-energy Japanese idol pop song released in September 2025. It serves as the debut single for the artist/group of the same name, produced under Cospanic Entertainment, a Tokyo-based company specializing in idol girl groups. Key Details: Artist: Sekai Gyakuten Sengen! (also stylized as 世界逆転宣言！) Release Date: September 14, 2025 Songwriters: Music & Lyrics: Koharu Maruse Arrangement: Takashi Okazaki (岡崎宙史) Tracklist: Sekai Gyakuten Sengen! (main track) Sekai Gyakuten Sengen! (Instrumental) Genre: J-Pop / Idol Pop With themes of empowerment, reversal of fortunes, and bold declarations—fitting the “gyakuten” (reversal) motif common in Japanese media. Official Music Video The MV premiered on YouTube on September 14, 2025, and has quickly gained traction for its vibrant visuals, dynamic choreography, and anthemic chorus. It’s described as a “milestone” in modern idol activism, blending catchy hooks with messages of world-changing defiance. Watch Here: YouTube MV Streaming Availability Available on major platforms including: Spotify Apple Music iTunes Store LINE MUSIC Amazon Music Unlimited Spotify: Search “Sekai Gyakuten Sengen” or “世界逆転宣言！” in the Spotify app or website (https://www.spotify.com). Apple Music: Search “Sekai Gyakuten Sengen” or “世界逆転宣言！” on Apple Music (https://music.apple.com). iTunes Store: Search “Sekai Gyakuten Sengen” or “世界逆転宣言！” in the iTunes Store (https://www.apple.com/itunes). LINE MUSIC: Search “世界逆転宣言！” on LINE MUSIC (https://music.line.me) or the LINE app (Japan-focused, may require regional access). Amazon Music Unlimited: Search “Sekai Gyakuten Sengen” or “世界逆転宣言！” on Amazon Music (https://music.amazon.com). This track has been highlighted in music blogs for its fresh take on the idol scene, drawing comparisons to groups like BANZAI JAPAN under the same label. If you’re into upbeat J-pop with a revolutionary vibe, it’s worth a spin—especially if you enjoy themes of “turning the world upside down” like in anime such as Gyakuten Sekai no Denchi Shoujo (Rumble Garanndoll). If this isn’t what you meant (e.g., a different media reference), let me know for more digging! Social Media & Live Schedule Group Official X: @sekai_gyakuten https://x.com/sekai_gyakuten For announcements and audition updates. Maruse Koharu (丸瀬こはる): @coco_kitoai https://x.com/coco_kitoai Low-tone voice, sound producer, water blue rep, anime fan, #ここちゃ可愛いぴえ. Rai no Sui (雷乃すい): @sui_sekasen https://x.com/sui_sekasen Yellow/orange rep, dynamic performer, featured in live shots and merch events. Midorigawa Fuyuki (緑川冬葵): @fuyuki_sekasen https://x.com/fuyuki_sekasen Green rep, active in event photos and lives. Narumi Rikka (成宮立夏): @rikka_sekasen https://x.com/rikka_sekasen Boyish rock idol, Fukui native, part of #酒クズぴえん部. Fukuda Kana (福田かな): @kana_sekasen https://x.com/kana_sekasen Purple rep, “gang” style, music school grad, captain of #セカセンラーメン部. MRPMWoodman Paul (Poison Fish) Manjyu Woodman

Load More